> We really need a simpler language that has the same ownership model Can you mention which part of the Rust language you found complicated (in real world), ex

> We really need a simpler language that has the same ownership model Can you mention which part of the Rust language you found complicated (in real world), excluding the ownership/memory management area (which includes: bck, lifetimes, smart pointers, traits related to synchronization)? I read a lot of comments about Rust's complexity, and while nobody doubts the complexity of the ownership/memory management, there's a very common lack of details when it comes to the rest of the language.