> but doesn't even mention one other. Which is an editorial choice. That's some weird hot take on a 20 min video titled "The CIA is a Terrorist Organization".

> but doesn't even mention one other. Which is an editorial choice. That's some weird hot take on a 20 min video titled "The CIA is a Terrorist Organization". He's obligated to mention Moussad, KGB/FSB et al, because "both sides"? Also last I checked, "we only did shady shit cause they did shady shit" isn't much os a defense anyway.