3 ms·
It's not the Python itself but the ecosystem and tooling around it, especially in machine learning / data science area. I find it strange that many people don't
by aldanor 6y ago
It's not the Python itself but the ecosystem and tooling around it, especially in machine learning / data science area. I find it strange that many people don't understand it and instead compare languages is. "Just use Julia" is not really an option in enterprise world either, when you already have hundreds of kloc, hundreds/thousands of packages and hundreds of people (not all of them professional developers, e.g. various analysts and quants) working on / using that on daily basis in production, plus all that code almost certainly depends on external packages (eg machine learning libraries) that are simply not available in Julia.
For personal projects - sure, go use Julia or ditch it and go straight for Rust.
- smabie 6y agoThey don't need to be available on Julia, calling Python libraries from Julia is incredibly painful. I'm not saying you should migrate your whole data analysis pipeline over, I'm saying you should write new services/analysis in Julia. There are production trading systems that are written in Python. And everyday, the quants and devs fruitlessly try and squeeze out more performance from the system instead of just accepting that Python is inappropriate.
- aldanor 6y agoWell, this repo is definitely about data analysis pipelines and not about production trading systems, no one is arguing that writing live prod trading systems in Python is inappropriate. And in order to write "new analysis" in another language, you would need to have access to the ecosystem that's been already developed in Python (both internally and externally), even to just get as far as loading all the data from all the data sources you need. Also worth a mention, "Python" often really means "C++ wrapped in pybind or the like"; again, it's pretty hard to match if there's a developed ecosystem of C/C++ libraries and extensions.