3 ms·
the video uploader is promoting his own competitor to youtube, a streaming service. that is mentioned in the end of the video, and it should really be mentioned
by inatreecrown2 6y ago
the video uploader is promoting his own competitor to youtube, a streaming service. that is mentioned in the end of the video, and it should really be mentioned in the thread title.
- odensc 6y agoThere are dozens of YouTubers on that platform who regularly advertise it in their videos on YouTube. Doubt that has anything to do with this.
- jeanlucas 6y agoIt doesn't, but it also means the author has a bias against YouTube to promote the other platform.
- tsimionescu 6y agoThere are many videos promoting competitors to YouTube that don't get shadow banned, nor visits from Homeland Security. For example The Legal Eagle channel always promotes a competitor to YouTube, as paid advertising in each video.
- jeanlucas 6y agoYou're mixing the arguments. I did not say he is getting Homeland Security visits because of a previous video, he got it because he is criticizing the country he lives in, and that country does not and never had opening to do that. And I did not mean that his video is being unlisted because of Nebula, the reason is because of the kind of content. My point about Nebula/YouTube is that his critics of YouTube are biased, since he gains something if people move to Nebula (in the long and the short run). Legal Eagle fan here \o
- jeanlucas 6y agoYeah, I did not mean that it's being shadowbanned because of it, but his criticism (to YouTube) are biased by definition.