4 ms·
> Just because it’s a controversy doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a valid or reasonable one. I would say the fact that the case survived a set of initial hearing
by CPLX 6y ago
> Just because it’s a controversy doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a valid or reasonable one.
I would say the fact that the case survived a set of initial hearings before a Federal judge and hasn't been dismissed means that it meets a very clear and precise definition of being valid and reasonable in a legal sense.
- simonh 6y agoEpic isn’t actually claiming the 30% for paid for apps on the store is unreasonable though. After all, they want to be able to charge on a store themselves so that would be self defeating. They are contending two things only. That in-app purchases are subject to a revenue split, and that they aren’t allowed to establish a store of their own on iOS.