3 ms·
The point is that it isn't the tool defeating the security system, it's the person using it.
by jstanley 6y ago
The point is that it isn't the tool defeating the security system, it's the person using it.
- pmiller2 6y agoTry defeating a security system with no tools, then. Let me know how far you get.
- colejohnson66 6y agoNot all million dollar houses have security systems. Multi million ones would though.
- michaelt 6y agoCalifornia's median house price is $706,900 [1] so a million-dollar home is only moderately above average. Simply wait until the house is empty and break a window with a rock. No tools required. Take 10 minutes to grab whatever valuables motivated you to rob the place, then get out of there. Even if they have a monitored alarm, it doesn't matter because you'll be gone before the response arrives. [1] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/california-housing-market-continues-recovery-as-median-home-price-breaks-700-000-mark-car-reports-301133378.html https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/california-housing-...
- Shared404 6y agoI'm gonna be "that guy" and point out that the rock is a tool. Different alternative would be to watch a street and see who has keys hidden outside. That way you're using part of the system to defeat the system.
- 0x008 6y agoYes, the point I was trying to make that the large difference in value between tool and target that is implied is completely irrelevant.