4 ms·
Are you trolling me? My claim is that "inability of (some) scientists" - the "some" is in the original. You then separately say that "It's almost impossible t
by Jabbles 6y ago
Are you trolling me?
My claim is that "inability of (some) scientists" - the "some" is in the original.
You then separately say that "It's almost impossible to validate a negative" (in relation to something else).
You then say that some scientists do in fact pour scorn, therefore my original claim is false?
- loopz 6y agoIs there a solution there in your mind. Why would anti-science people listen to scientists in the first place? There are many ways people think, the minority think like you do. I'm just showing how such statements can be tweaked. You'll always fight an uphill battle trying to convince people with "logic", especially when people subscribe to religion, superstition, fear and conspiracy theories. This no matter the "scorn". The other side can muster up much more of that anyways. Unfortunate yes, but it's a call for much needed creativity also. Condemnation has already been thoroughly tried now.