> Without evidence there’s no proof that something is true. But without evidence on the contrary there’s no proof it isn’t true either. You are arguing that th

> Without evidence there’s no proof that something is true. But without evidence on the contrary there’s no proof it isn’t true either. You are arguing that the conspiracy theory label is unjustified. But if the proof for your theory is primarily based on absence of proof to the contrary, then it would rightfully be labelled a conspiracy theory. Even if a conspiracy theory turns out to be true that does not make the label unjustified.