3 ms·
Posting this under a throwaway for obvious reasons. I volunteered to do some analysis on the election data because I'm more interested in finding the truth tha
by AnonDataSci 6y ago
Posting this under a throwaway for obvious reasons.
I volunteered to do some analysis on the election data because I'm more interested in finding the truth than being partisan. During the counting process, the relative advantage of a ballot reporting batch toward Biden has strong correlation to certain external regressors that
are meta to the counting process itself. These correlations absolutely should not be there, and yet they occur in swing states with p-values in excess of 10^-40. I can't say which external regressors, because this is part of an active legal battle, but suffice it to say, something strange is afoot. It's better to perform an audit and prove no fraud than to be ideological about the impossibility of fraud.
- smitty1e 6y agoHoping the case makes it to SCOTUS and the answer is decisive for all but the deadest dead-enders.
- crocodiletears 6y agoI know you say it's part of an active legal battle, but would you be willing to give more details on this, either in the comment section here (preferably) or via email (contact(at)crocodiletears(dot)cc)? I've tuned most of this out given how exhausting it's become to sort through all the gaslighting and conspiracy theories being thrown into information space. I'd like some perspective from someone who's actually close to the trenches. Even if you can't now, would you be willing to after the case resolves?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- black_puppydog 6y agoFrankly I'd disregard this entirely because active legal battles of this sort are either entirely public, or part of the problem. But hey it's not my country...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]