3 ms·
I sure hope it's cheaper than the Rohloff hub, I can't imagine anyone buying these if they are very expensive. I thought I had read that chains and sprockets we
by vondur 6y ago
I sure hope it's cheaper than the Rohloff hub, I can't imagine anyone buying these if they are very expensive. I thought I had read that chains and sprockets were pretty efficeint in terms of energy loss.
- maxerickson 6y agoApparently well adjusted modern gear can be 98% efficient.
- fabianhjr 6y agoThat is mentioned in the article: > All of that is working, too, with independent tests showing properly race-prepped drivetrains to be as much as 98% efficient. > That elusive 2% > As good as chain optimization has become, there comes a point where there’s no more optimizing left to do, and there are no other options but to rethink the system. Though, not as in any modern drivetrain but high-end competition drivetrains. At least I imagine it would be with really expensive solutions like Ceramic Speed bearings everywhere.
- leoh 6y agoIt's the chain not the internal hub. Rohloff can use either a chain or a belt drive. The belt drive is cheap, and works with other internal hubs (sealed planetary gear system), which are much cheaper (e.g. Shimano, others make them).
- petre 6y agoTourers buy them. Money well spent. Just change the oil every year. Less efficient than a clean deraileur drivetrain but those stay clean for about 30 minutes.
- mauvehaus 6y agoEven a muddy chain is unreasonably efficient, to the tune of maybe 85-90% [0]. Having bike toured, keeping a chain halfway clean (or at least not muddy) is not hard. Yes, I see the appeal of an internally geared hub, but marginal differences in efficiency either way would not be high on my list of concerns. [0] https://cyclingtips.com/2020/05/how-many-watts-does-a-dirty-chain-steal/ https://cyclingtips.com/2020/05/how-many-watts-does-a-dirty-...