4 ms·

Presumably a lot of the optimizations they use for their own compilers would be upstreamed into LLVM, no?

• saagarjha 6y ago
  It seems like many have not for a number of years. A14 is still not even listed in LLVM's list of aarch64 targets :/
  • cozzyd 6y ago
    Very sad to hear, but unsurprising. That's what you get for not using a GPL compiler, I guess.
    • mhh__ 6y ago
      Indeed, although it's worth saying that GNU were offered LLVM and said no, they have suffered from their own success because new developers and culture within programming is now post-GNU where people can't remember the environment that led to the GPL becoming popular.
      • cozzyd 6y ago
        yes, and it's clearly something rms regrets: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00594.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00... If rms had a sane way of reading e-mail, things might be different :).
  • my123 6y ago
    It takes them a while. Apple A13 is there in the Apple LLVM target list at https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64.td https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/T.... A14/M1 will come, but the question is when...