3 ms·
I'm sure it's great, but we'll have to wait for the source/demo/pretrained model to really tell.
by FredFS456 6y ago
I'm sure it's great, but we'll have to wait for the source/demo/pretrained model to really tell.
- m00dy 6y agoGenerally speaking, reproducibility in research is not the main concern.
- nuclearnice1 6y agoProposed timeline from GitHub: > We first plan to publish an online image/video matting demo along with the pre-trained model in Dec. 2020. We then plan to release the code of supervised training and unsupervised SOC in Jan. 2021. We finally plan to open source the PHM-100 validation benchmark in Feb. 2021.
- gfodor 6y agoThis sounds awesome so don't take my comment as a criticism, but it is interesting that it highlights a difference between academics and non-academics - academics often publish papers before code, whereas non-academics/hackers publish code, and then probably never get around to writing the documentation :)
- iamtedd 6y agoMaybe if we can get the academics and hackers to perform some human matting.. [reference to comments about misreading the title]
- roel_v 6y agoI think the linked Youtube demo video is pretty impressive, compared to what I see in most video conferencing software.