Before I address your point, I'll clarify that I want to use correct/standard definitions, not definitions only understood by small subsets of the population.

Before I address your point, I'll clarify that I want to use correct/standard definitions, not definitions only understood by small subsets of the population. Now to your point: private property intended for personal use, which socialist ideology claims is not problematic, is the direct progenitor of private property used for other purposes, like earning an income for the owner from being rented out, or from being utilized in an enterprise that employs other people to operate the private property. The differences between private property intended for personal use, and private property intended for business or commercial use, are completely superficial with respect to the basic principles that society operates on.