I loved this essay, but... for me, one of the interesting failures is in assuming that there is only one dimension for being unconventional. Even though one m

I loved this essay, but... for me, one of the interesting failures is in assuming that there is only one dimension for being unconventional. Even though one might like to think of themselves on an axis from "conventional" to "unconventional", my experience has shown that your normality can vary wildly depending upon whether we are talking about matters of love, finance, career, etc. As well as nuances therein. What I think would be quite probing would be an exploration of the ways in which you might be unconventional in some aspects of your career, whereas conventional in others. It's these fine-differences that the articles suggests we could adjust to achieve parity overall in a particular domain, but does not actually explore...