3 ms·

I've contributed to linux for the Mac EFI myself, so that argument is moot. We clearly have different understandings of openness. I also wrote a savage driver f

I've contributed to linux for the Mac EFI myself, so that argument is moot. We clearly have different understandings of openness. I also wrote a savage driver for mplayer in the early 2000s but just because it was possible to write a driver for it, that doesn't mean the hardware was open in any reasonable sense of the word. Again, just because they decided to allow you to disable secure boot on those devices, probably mainly to drive adoption of their arch, doesn't mean it is any more open than a lock you can pick with your own lockpicking set. The irony is that the jailbreaking crowd has spend so much time trying to break into apple devices that in comparison this now seems open. EDIT: Also can we stop pretending that english isn't english and the opposite of locked isn't unlocked/open?

saagarjha 6y ago
Nobody brought "open" into this discussion other than you. The claim was that this hardware is not locked down, and it is not. I don't think there is much more to say because this computer is literally the definition of not locked down because they give you the key to the lock.
- rjzzleep 6y ago
  Fair enough, but the GP actually did no mention of locked down. He said kinda locked down. Then your jailbreaking buddy defined that as "it's only locked down if it is a secure boot device where no third party access". When it's clear that that's not what the GP meant, not to mention that is english the opposite of locked is open/unlocked. Since we're still speaking english, "not locked" means open. Not to mention that apple can silently overwrite this at any point in time with a MacOS update. As they have done so before leaving plenty of macs bricked because of broken SPI flash[1]. I share the excitement for the M1 chip, but you would have to be blind not to see this as troubling for the future of open computing. [1] https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/395032 https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/395032

saagarjha 6y ago

Nobody brought "open" into this discussion other than you. The claim was that this hardware is not locked down, and it is not. I don't think there is much more to say because this computer is literally the definition of not locked down because they give you the key to the lock.

rjzzleep 6y ago
Fair enough, but the GP actually did no mention of locked down. He said kinda locked down. Then your jailbreaking buddy defined that as "it's only locked down if it is a secure boot device where no third party access". When it's clear that that's not what the GP meant, not to mention that is english the opposite of locked is open/unlocked. Since we're still speaking english, "not locked" means open. Not to mention that apple can silently overwrite this at any point in time with a MacOS update. As they have done so before leaving plenty of macs bricked because of broken SPI flash[1]. I share the excitement for the M1 chip, but you would have to be blind not to see this as troubling for the future of open computing. [1] https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/395032 https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/395032