Well stated, as expected. That said, it's heavy on features and light on benefits (which include often undesirable side effects). For example, in PG's world un

Well stated, as expected. That said, it's heavy on features and light on benefits (which include often undesirable side effects). For example, in PG's world unbound-thinking has value. It is generally seen as a good thing. Do the same within a religion and you're a heretic. Worse, you could end up dead. Perhaps he'll do a follow up? To explore the benefits (and friction) for individuals, as well as teams and organizations. Maybe even go so far as to address diversity beyond the conventional paradigm (i.e., race, gender, etc.) That would be great.