The article has many problems past the generally insulting tone. The most interesting one I saw on a quick scan was the implicit suggestion that anyone would be

The article has many problems past the generally insulting tone. The most interesting one I saw on a quick scan was the implicit suggestion that anyone would be happy if their emails immediately disappeared after reading, so as to establish forward secrecy. The article doesn't bother to define exactly what is meant by email so it is hard to know exactly what they are proposing as an alternative past the bizarre mention of Signal.