4 ms·

Thanks! We currently have coverage of about 200 species from the northeast US. We're focusing on expanding the coverage to the rest of the US (~500 more species

by apu 15y ago

Thanks! We currently have coverage of about 200 species from the northeast US. We're focusing on expanding the coverage to the rest of the US (~500 more species)...and then the world! We definitely want to take advantage of user contributions in some way, but we're still trying to figure out the best thing to do. Also, the app contains several very high-quality images of each species taken in a particular way by a talented group called FindingSpecies, and to keep the visual integrity of the app, we would want very similar photos for all species that we add. This might be difficult to outsource to the crowd.

defrost 15y ago
It's not something that can be readily outsourced to "the crowd" in general but it is something that can achieved using a hierarchy of interested/invested self checking power users. It's a similar problem to that faced by, say, open source projects that aim to maintain a certain level of code quality and style matching in contributed source code. Addendum: the image collections of the Australian National Botanic Gardens and the Australian National Herbarium might be of interest to you down the track: http://www.anbg.gov.au/anbg/photo-collection/index.html http://www.anbg.gov.au/anbg/photo-collection/index.html