4 ms·

"About a month ago I was chatting on skype to a colleague about a payload for one of our clients,” he wrote. “Completely by accident, my payload executed in my

by dguido 15y ago

"About a month ago I was chatting on skype to a colleague about a payload for one of our clients,” he wrote. “Completely by accident, my payload executed in my colleagues skype client." If I had to guess, they were probably pasting back and forth JavaScript "payloads" for an XSS and broke the parser that Skype is using for formatting chat messages. Not that interesting. Chat messages on Skype aren't exactly the most effective propogation mechanism either. Don't you have to be approved as someone's friend before they can send you a message? This probably won't be used in any massive attacks any time soon. Until then, continue to annoy your girlfriends as the author apparently did.

barrybe 15y ago
It sounds like it's still pretty dangerous even if it's not "interesting". As far as propogation, it could definitely be effective, it all depends on how interconnected the graph of Skype friendships is. There have been many nasty worms which travelled across AIM friend lists, for example.
bradleyland 15y ago
There are plenty of times where I believe threats are overhyped. This is not one of them. 1) The default privacy setting in Skype is to allow anyone to send you a chat message. I know plenty of Skype users who complain to me about random chat messages, which indicates to me that they haven't changed their privacy preferences yet. 2) Regardless of the type of payload they used, "Low and behold I was able to remotely gain a shell." Remote shell. Through a Skype message. Would you give a random person shell access to your computer? It's more than interesting, it's terrible. 3) Spammers already infest the Skype network. If they discover this vuln before Skype patches it, you can fully expect that it will be exploited. There is no mention of priviledge escalation in the article, but once you have a shell, the world is your oyster. There are bound to be exploitable services locally on the machine. Once you're in, you've got the run of the place.
zachanker 15y ago
You can specify whether or not to allow chats from anyone, or only those on your contact list. Can't recall what the default is on OSX.
wladimir 15y ago
Even if the default is to only accept messages from friends, worms certainly spread this way. If you want an example, see one of the MSN worms: they simply send a link, which if clicked it sends the worm through to all of the people in the contact list.

by dguido 15y ago

barrybe 15y ago

It sounds like it's still pretty dangerous even if it's not "interesting". As far as propogation, it could definitely be effective, it all depends on how interconnected the graph of Skype friendships is. There have been many nasty worms which travelled across AIM friend lists, for example.

bradleyland 15y ago

There are plenty of times where I believe threats are overhyped. This is not one of them. 1) The default privacy setting in Skype is to allow anyone to send you a chat message. I know plenty of Skype users who complain to me about random chat messages, which indicates to me that they haven't changed their privacy preferences yet. 2) Regardless of the type of payload they used, "Low and behold I was able to remotely gain a shell." Remote shell. Through a Skype message. Would you give a random person shell access to your computer? It's more than interesting, it's terrible. 3) Spammers already infest the Skype network. If they discover this vuln before Skype patches it, you can fully expect that it will be exploited. There is no mention of priviledge escalation in the article, but once you have a shell, the world is your oyster. There are bound to be exploitable services locally on the machine. Once you're in, you've got the run of the place.

zachanker 15y ago

You can specify whether or not to allow chats from anyone, or only those on your contact list. Can't recall what the default is on OSX.

wladimir 15y ago

Even if the default is to only accept messages from friends, worms certainly spread this way. If you want an example, see one of the MSN worms: they simply send a link, which if clicked it sends the worm through to all of the people in the contact list.