3 ms·
At least the spying is removed by not connecting it to the internet, though I still get the great full OS experience :/ I have a smart TV not connected to the
by goatinaboat 6y ago
At least the spying is removed by not connecting it to the internet, though I still get the great full OS experience :/
I have a smart TV not connected to the internet, just a HDMI connection to another box. Then I learned that IP-over-HDMI is a thing!
In the very near future this will be even more futile - the TV will have it’s own built-in cellular connection just for telemetry. Anyone who objects will be shouted down as a 5G conspiracy nut, but this is exactly what 5G is designed for.
- mtsr 6y agoThat’s horrible, I hadn’t even looked at it like that. But it will actually work better with 3/4G because 5Gs range is so short and it would be easy to block with just a little tinfoil.
- Foivos 6y ago5G has a lot of bands. Most of them are close to the 3G/4G bands, so it should have the same signal as 3G/4G. Also, new IoT technologies use techniques allowing them to operate at a much weaker signal. But you can always just destroy the antenna.
- realityking 6y ago> Then I learned that IP-over-HDMI is a thing! While it’s in the spec, I’m not aware of a single piece of consumer electronics that actually support it. The standard is an utter failure. In HDMI 2.1 the wires previously used for Ethernet-over-HDMI are now used for eARC making these two features mutually exclusive.
- therealx 6y agoI believe some higher end residential automation automation software support it?
- ranma42 6y agoAnecdotally, the first Sony smart tv my grandma got (after her old tube TV died) managed to receive a firmware upgrade over the antenna cable (don't remember if it was cable TV or satellite). She certainly didn't have any internet in her home. Of course that led to a fun episode of "My TV is broken" (actually just showing a prompt to start the firmware upgrade), in general she got very confused by the smart TVs UI often...