4 ms·

This is somewhat the case as SNI is unencrypted.

• m-p-3 6y ago
  But there's eSNI.
  • thayne 6y ago
    Which is a very new technology, and not widely deployed yet.
    • zaarn 6y ago
      I get about 5k unique visitors from my websites, additional 20k visitors from a community project I'm in. We see about 30 - 40% eSNI Adoption.
      • thayne 6y ago
        And that is just client support. For eSNI to work, both client and server must support it.
        • zaarn 6y ago
          Adoption, not support, meaning the clients and server both support it. I bet most of the non-supporting clients are simply either a bit outdated or had it disabled (probably by the client local AV engine).
          • gsich 6y ago
            Unlikely. Since OpenSSL has no support for it (by extension this includes Apache and Nginx) because it's not a standard yet, adoption is very low. Also Chromium and by extension Chrome has no support for it. Firefox does support a draft, but since Firefox usage numbers are somewhat low depending on what statistic you believe, this amounts to not much.
            • zaarn 6y ago
              Well, again, we see about 20-40% eSNI activity based on our connection data, of about 60k monthly users.
              • gsich 6y ago
                Not plausible unless you have a very specific userbase, ie Firefox users mostly.
  • gsich 6y ago
    A draft. OpenSSL devs wait for it to be finished.
• BrandoElFollito 6y ago
  Could you expand on that please? SNI is not the full URL or am I missing something?