My understanding is that it's unlikely cpuinfo and meminfo will be made cgroup-aware due to procfs-specific conventions on magic files. Making global procfs fil

My understanding is that it's unlikely cpuinfo and meminfo will be made cgroup-aware due to procfs-specific conventions on magic files. Making global procfs files change based on the current process is seen as a bad design these days -- should it be based on the process reading or the process opening the file (in this instance, both solutions are bad but for different reasons)? From memory, the topic was brought up early on in cgroup development.