3 ms·
Couldn't these companies have lambda's running on Azure, not costing them anything when not being used. After say three failures to connect to AWS the service
by rmason 6y ago
Couldn't these companies have lambda's running on Azure, not costing them anything when not being used. After say three failures to connect to AWS the service would change to Azure for say 24 hours?
- itisit 6y agoAs another commenter is right to point out, a multi-region setup would suffice—no additional cloud provider(s) necessary. This outage says more about companies failing to architect adequate failover than it does about the risks of the cloud.