5 ms·
It could be a numbers station but (1) the known numerical messages are very short and (2) that wouldn’t explain why there is a buzzer.
by laretluval 6y ago
It could be a numbers station but (1) the known numerical messages are very short and (2) that wouldn’t explain why there is a buzzer.
- conscion 6y agoMy guess would be that the buzzer is so that the listeners know the station is still "up" and hasn't been destroyed
- merlinscholz 6y agoOr to keep the frequency free from other transmitters, as described in the article
- bayindirh 6y agoThe buzzer is there for both to mark the frequency and signal that it's alive. Its old sequence had a hourly faster buzz which returned to normal at the beginning of the hour. It looked like this X:59:00 - Buzzing gets faster. (X+1):00:00 - Normal buzzing resumes. I think it served as a crude hourly sync signal for some systems until GLONASS came and provided atomic level sync. This also implies that there may be other non-human systems listening for this station. It can be speculated that Russian Perimeter (Dead Hand) system [0] may be one of the listeners. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand
- droidist2 6y agoWould that mean that if the buzzing stops for an extended period, Dead Hand assumes World War 3 is underway and launches the missiles?
- bayindirh 6y agoAccording to available information (and speculation), perimeter listens to various inputs (which is a good thing). It's said that it has connections to seismic and pressure sensors and can check whether communication to critical infrastructure is intact. So it keeps tabs on many heart-beat signals it seems. UVB-76 might be one of them. Moving a low traffic radio station with an interesting sound just because a bunch of HAM radio guys doesn't make sense. It has to have some higher function to warrant the move. With the new over the horizon radar systems Russia is deploying, I guess that signals from these would be evaluated too. Going in to wild speculation territory, Russia's in-house CPUs would fit the bill for these kind of systems nicely.
- gmueckl 6y agoThe Wikipedia article makes the operation of that station appear to be at a level that is far more relaxed than what I would expect from a really important continuous liveness signal. So I consider the use for something as lethal as the Dead Hand system unlikely, if it even still exists.
- bayindirh 6y agoIf I understood correctly, Dead Hand has many inputs and generally stays off so, maintenance won't create unintended consequences. If whole system (and world's fate) relies on a single buzzer, we have much bigger problems :)