3 ms·
No? Much of it remains true, "true enough", or potentially true, unless I missed a blowout news story that invalidates this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.or
by archagon 6y ago
No? Much of it remains true, "true enough", or potentially true, unless I missed a blowout news story that invalidates this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Veracity_and_corroboration_status_of_specific_allegations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Veracity_and_co...
Incidentally, I feel like I've been seeing a trickle of propaganda over the last few months attempting to outright discredit the dossier. People repeat that it's a "complete fabrication" as if it's a universally agreed-upon fact.
- dilyevsky 6y agohttps://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/11/03/raw-intelligence https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/11/03/raw-intelligence Also from your own link: > But there's a difference between things being fake or a hoax or a fraud or a lie and things being incorrect Hilarious
- archagon 6y agoA bunch of speculative research by anonymous third-party sources in a Russian-language paper with little journalistic cachet is your evidence?
- dilyevsky 6y ago> Russian-language paper with little journalistic cachet Clearly you are clueless
- archagon 6y agoAll I see in this article is a bunch of "anonymous Twitter detectives said so-and-so". This does not feel like reputable investigative journalism to me.
- ghayes 6y agoWe should refrain from ad hominem statements and stick to the merits of the argument. Personally, I agree with GP that Meduza doesn't really inspire confidence in its reporting here.
- dilyevsky 6y agoI mean it’s no cnn with their incredibly high standards i agree ;) also did you notice many links to other sources?