> you tacitly approve This view seems quite reductionist. It's smells like guilt by association. It excludes the middle ground where you do not approve but ign

> you tacitly approve This view seems quite reductionist. It's smells like guilt by association. It excludes the middle ground where you do not approve but ignore that due to other priorities (such as money or excitement about technology you get to work on). Approval is not a binary choice. It also is subject to tradeoffs. So all you can derive from someone working at facebook is that their preference against indirect contribution (by several hops) to genocide is weaker than the combination of some other preferences. This may also be due to how they're discounting that responsibility distance.