4 ms·
I've used non, I like it and I like the idea, I wasn't really a fan of the ui though. I used non-sequencer for a bit but ended up switching to muse and rosegard
by grawprog 6y ago
I've used non, I like it and I like the idea, I wasn't really a fan of the ui though. I used non-sequencer for a bit but ended up switching to muse and rosegarden before Ardour got midi. I find it almost a bit too modular. I do like the idea of having ardour as an end point for various things.
I tend to sequence and record audio into ardour then do some processing and mixing there.
Then I'll mixdown in ardour then patch that track through jamin into a new ardour track for mastering.
I find that setup still gives me flexibility while having a sort of centralized 'master console' or something.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agojamin ... i hate to be a nag, but please please please stop using this software. Conceptually it's a cool application, but the DSP artifacts it generates are just awful. There are plugins you can use within Ardour that will do a much better job than jamin.
- grawprog 6y agoCould you point me to some? I started using jamin when it was pretty much the only mastering available, if there's something better now I'd like to check them out.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agoThe Harrison XT plugins would be the obvious thing to point to, though they are not FLOSS. LSP multiband compressor. x42 limiter. Zam multiband compressor.
- grawprog 6y agoThank you. As awesome as the Harrison stuff all is, I make music for fun, so it's a bit out of my price range. I've been really liking the LSP plugins though, i'll have to check those out.