2 ms·
Well you have an eye for objectivity. Many people don't. And whenever there are two conflicting versions of a story it sows some doubt on both of them. We know
by galaxyLogic 6y ago
Well you have an eye for objectivity. Many people don't. And whenever there are two conflicting versions of a story it sows some doubt on both of them. We know this from politics already. So from a pure PR and game-theoretic standpoint I think they made the right (pro-active) move.
- AsyncAwait 6y ago> Well you have an eye for objectivity. The NYT is far from objective, so this may actually work.