Great read with pleasing aesthetics. However, there is one point I do not agree with, namely: > That isn't to say children should understand your references an

Great read with pleasing aesthetics. However, there is one point I do not agree with, namely: > That isn't to say children should understand your references and jargon. Do not over-simplify your language and weaken your ideas. Rather, children must be able to follow the logic of every argument. Richard Feynman argues that people often hide between jargon to hide the fact that one doesn't know. As a programmer, I often see jargon as an additional dependency and only introduce it if I really cannot avoid it.