3 ms·
Fun fact: I believe Berkshire Hathaway's website is a frontpage site from back in the day. I kind of imagine an old pentium multimedia PC that a secretary boots
by dalbasal 6y ago
Fun fact: I believe Berkshire Hathaway's website is a frontpage site from back in the day. I kind of imagine an old pentium multimedia PC that a secretary boots once per quarter to update it. It's much better than most holding companies' sites.
Anyway... I feel like this article answers its own question at the start...
"many corporations such as the Dow Jones, Bloomberg, Apple, etc. were sinking millions into building their own, completely incompatible dial-in Internet services."
"They" eventually succeeded, by using the www as a platform 10 years later rather than outcompeting it in 1995. Frontpage, Dreamweaver and such are tools. The internet-era equivalents (youtube, FB, IG, etc.) aren't tools. FB is a "platform." More comparable to the WWW itself than to frontpage. You don't need tools to post on FB, so no frontpage.
In the abstract, a FB-like platform does a similar job to a Frontpage-like tool. Publish stuff online. The FB-like platform is a 1000X better business proposition. A FB doesn't have to charge. It can attract users with access to other users. No hosting/files/responsibility. Advertising is worth more than software licenses, etc.
So the real question is "why did the www not succeed competitively against FB/Youtube/Etc?" Why don't we do what we do online via www and other open standards/protocols instead of through platforms like FB?
OTOH, the WWW obviously did succeed. We all use it every day, but with a third party platform like FB between us and other people. I also think it's remarkable that the www exists at all. No one owns it. It's not property, doesn't have a share price... Quite unusual.
Tim Berners Lee is highly regarded. Zuck is one of the most powerful and wealthy people on earth. He made many other people very wealthy. Tim too, but more indirectly. It's remarkable that a Tim can ever beat a Zuck. ... But history proves they can.
- tyingq 6y ago"Fun fact: I believe Berkshire Hathaway's website is a frontpage site from back in the day." Sillier than that even. From https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/subs/sublinks.html https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/subs/sublinks.html <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15"> Some other pages on the site: <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Adobe PageMill 2.0 Win"> <meta NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Microsoft FrontPage 3.0"> Seems like they tried all the cool WYSIWYG tools.
- spicybright 6y agoI don't know why but I love looking at the historical "crudge" that builds up in situations like this! Especially from people that don't specialize in software.
- tyingq 6y agoI enjoying finding crud I created myself still running out there. Even some true fork a process cgi-bin remains :)
- pvitz 6y agoI have never had a look at their website, so thanks for posting that. Buffet's recommendations for GEICO and Borsheim's [0] are funny and not something I would have expected from him... [0] https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/message.html https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/message.html