3 ms·
You've linked to peeked not peaked, which was the GP's point. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peak https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peak For other readers, w
by mattmanser 6y ago
You've linked to peeked not peaked, which was the GP's point.
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peak https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peak
For other readers, wikitionary does not make any such claim about 'peaked'. The only definition it contains is this:
"Having a peak or peaks"
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peaked https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/peaked
- rjknight 6y agoMy understanding of the GP's post was they believed that: a) "peak" was a typo or mis-spelling, and the intended word was "peek", and b) that "peek" is incorrect anyway. The link was intended to show that there is a definition of "peek" which would make sense. I think that "peak" is a typo, as it is common enough to be the subject of jokes. [1][2] [1] https://theoatmeal.com/comics/sneak_peek https://theoatmeal.com/comics/sneak_peek [2] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/finally-a-useful-twitter-bot-it-corrects-people-who-write-sneak-peak/250873/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/final...