That’s a fair point, and it’s definitely possible. We shall see, sometime before Sunday! That implies a high level of intentional deception on the part of the

That’s a fair point, and it’s definitely possible. We shall see, sometime before Sunday! That implies a high level of intentional deception on the part of the NYT, though. It has certainly happened, of course; and the opinion columns are full of it (like they are at all papers). I don’t believe that the NYT generally engages in intentional deception, however - so I’m inclined to believe that they aren’t intending on it now. But as you said, it is possible. And a healthy skepticism of the papers is not bad.