2 ms·
It seems plausible to me that The Times could use very similar language to "a number of people," and giving 3 examples while implying that the number is far mor
by ericpauley 6y ago
It seems plausible to me that The Times could use very similar language to "a number of people," and giving 3 examples while implying that the number is far more.
- drewbug01 6y agoThat’s a fair point, and it’s definitely possible. We shall see, sometime before Sunday! That implies a high level of intentional deception on the part of the NYT, though. It has certainly happened, of course; and the opinion columns are full of it (like they are at all papers). I don’t believe that the NYT generally engages in intentional deception, however - so I’m inclined to believe that they aren’t intending on it now. But as you said, it is possible. And a healthy skepticism of the papers is not bad.