3 ms·
But surely openness is a spectrum, and if they've released versions in the past, and they claim they will be releasing this one, then that still counts as being
by msbarnett 16y ago
But surely openness is a spectrum, and if they've released versions in the past, and they claim they will be releasing this one, then that still counts as being "open"?
- rimantas 16y agoAnything related to Apple is always a good source for some sensationalist piece.
- Hov 16y agoWait, how is someone stating facts sensationalist?
- Macha 16y agoBut the conditions of the (L)GPL is that they are _required_ to do so when they release the source at the same time. Releasing it later is more open than not releasing it, but it's still not allowed with the (L)GPL.
- bricestacey 16y agoIt's not about being "open". Its about following the terms of the license. And I believe the only way to enforce a license is through litigation so a lawsuit should be expected.