It seems to work in other countries. Neither CNN nor Fox is quality journalism, "quality" being the adjective you left out. The NYT also issued an apology fo

It seems to work in other countries. Neither CNN nor Fox is quality journalism, "quality" being the adjective you left out. The NYT also issued an apology for their coverage about WMD which was not rigorously fact checked. One of the reporters, Judith Miller, later joined Fox News. Quality doesn't mean 100% correct all the time, it means significantly better than the alternative. Comparing the coverage of different sources is part of how you can reach your own conclusions, instead of blindly adopting whatever opinion is broadcasted to you.