Yeah, the cascading failure of all the other services is a deep architectural issue. Having lots of services that do one thing and one thing well makes a lot o

Yeah, the cascading failure of all the other services is a deep architectural issue. Having lots of services that do one thing and one thing well makes a lot of sense. Breaking them out into separate components brings a level of visibility into the system. And it's AWS's whole business model. But it does mean that, fundamentally, service X is available when and only when (WAOW?) services A, B, C, etc. are all available. Its uptime is no greater than min(uptime(A), uptime(B), etc) I'm trying to rework the authentication for our application and integrate it with our parent company's systems. As we talk to other teams, I see all these architecture diagrams where the solution to every problem is Yet Another Service, to where you're running a real rube goldberg machine.