3 ms·
I was always sympathetic to the argument that we underestimate how valuable having a centralized control is (when it doesn't go off the rails). We get a lot of
by nscalf 6y ago
I was always sympathetic to the argument that we underestimate how valuable having a centralized control is (when it doesn't go off the rails). We get a lot of fraud absorbed by banks right now so that end users aren't holding the bag. When there are bubbles, the fed tries to mitigate the affect of massive price crashes/economic downturns. The SEC limits the impact of market manipulation, and makes the game generally more fair. And on the tail end of all of that, being able to track money more effectively makes law enforcement's job easier.
All of those things have their own downsides, but I think they're all net positives. Though I do think modern monetary theory is a great example of why we might want something decentralized, and is a big reason for why bitcoin is gaining traction.
- admin000001 6y agoThe system in place right now is meant to protect the corporations not the users. Credit card companies ask for too little proof of identification, and then blame the user in the name of “identity theft”. The problem is no, no one stole the person’s identity. No one was kidnapped or killed and then replaced with a look a like. Instead, the company was scammed, but they don’t care because they can pass the buck.