"was in retaliation for his constitutionally protected criticism of his employer." Is there any question why this guy was really fired? I will never understan

"was in retaliation for his constitutionally protected criticism of his employer." Is there any question why this guy was really fired? I will never understand why people seem to think they can criticize their employers and then sue after they're fired for doing so. People, you can get fired from a job for almost any reason at all. You are not entitled to a job. Sure, badmouthing your employer is "free speech", but they are also free to fire you for doing the badmouthing. In this case they used his browsing history as justification for the firing, but if not that, it would have been for something else sooner or later. He simply had it coming.