4 ms·
Yes, but the article did not present it that way. I think GP's disclaimer was warranted.
by sp332 6y ago
Yes, but the article did not present it that way. I think GP's disclaimer was warranted.
- rexreed 6y agoI believe the author is either sincerely of the belief that GPT-3 is some superintelligence or is pulling everyone's leg in his writing. The conclusion leaves me baffled. Did he really think that GPT-3 was even capable of providing any sort of "considered" response? > Conclusion > > We can only speculate as to GPT-3's internal states. > Perhaps it knows the question perfectly well, but considers > humans as too immature and spoiled to tell: In its opinion, > we shouldn’t even bother to find questions to answers we > can’t possible understand. Or, more likely, it doesn’t know > either. Anyway, it comes across as a jerk.