4 ms·
The article points out that while there are drawbacks to checking app signatures, there have also been documented benefits in terms of uncovering vulnerabilitie
by krrrh 6y ago
The article points out that while there are drawbacks to checking app signatures, there have also been documented benefits in terms of uncovering vulnerabilities and making systems more secure, which also has direct privacy benefits to the users whose systems don't become compromised by malware.
The balancing act between freedom and security is never going to not be a debate. Engaging in it in good faith as in the linked article is a reasonable approach (that you don't usually see represented in Klein's oeuvre): consider tradeoffs, counterarguments, and historical context from different perspectives. Apple is flawed sure, because all complex solutions are inherently flawed. They have a responsibility to be more open and transparent, and I'd prefer to see more details and updates to their otherwise laudable security whitepaper [1], and clearer more accessible user-definable toggles. But your or my preferred solution probably isn't the ideal default for most users, or for the ecosystem as a whole.
[1] https://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1902/en_US/apple-platform-security-guide.pdf https://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1902/en_US/app...
- AshWolfy 6y agoSignature checking is not what people are mad about, the only way to get anything not bad from this situation is in the most abstract view that signature checking is not bad thats the problem with people who dismiss Klein and her "oeuvre" you are so desperate to stay in the middle you refuse to see evidence right in front of your face
- krrrh 6y agoSometimes people just draw different conclusions because they have different values and priorities or willingness to accept incremental progress. I’m not dismissing Klein, I referred to her “oeuvre” out of my respect for her as an artist.