On the other hand, to bring home the message the good people at LegaAmbiente do use everything they can find (and more) on a worldwide scale with an incredible

On the other hand, to bring home the message the good people at LegaAmbiente do use everything they can find (and more) on a worldwide scale with an incredible number of non-sequiturs. Example: the picture on page 24 (damage to infrastructure in Japan, full page) is there at the only scope of impressing the casual onlooker (the chapter is about "Why there are more risks in the cities as compared to the past?", and the last subchapter is tangential, on coastline cities) I wish that we could have meaningful data and some objective comments of them without the hype and/or the removal of the (IMHO excessive) scaremongering/disaster-movie-like predictions.