5 ms·
Yup--my camera (Canon 60D) was listed, but when I used a photo that had been exported with Lightroom, it couldn't read the serial number. Only when I gave an or
by kyleslattery 15y ago
Yup--my camera (Canon 60D) was listed, but when I used a photo that had been exported with Lightroom, it couldn't read the serial number. Only when I gave an original JPEG did it have any success, and it didn't end up finding any photos, since anything I've uploaded has been exported through Lightroom.
- zalew 15y agoI noticed the same a few days ago when I tested it. All my JPGs are exports from Lightzone and there's no serial, my originals are all RAW, so - no luck for those who don't shoot jpeg/raw+jpeg.
- dunham 15y agoI tried it with an old Canon Rebel XTi photo that had gone through Lightroom and flickr. "exiftool" shows a serial number in the image, but the web site does not. I downloaded the "original" size from flickr - resized flickr images seem to drop most of the exif info, and the "exif info" displayed on the web site no longer shows serial numbers.
- klinquist 15y agoLightroom has an export option called "Minimize metadata" that strips a lot of EXIF out.
- novas0x2a 15y agoYou might have "minimize embedded metadata" checked in the export options; uncheck it and I bet the serial will survive the export. Also, if you want more control over exported metadata, Jeffrey Friedl made a plugin[1] for that. I haven't used this particular plugin; I do however use his flickr and geocode plugins, and they're both great. 1) http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler