4 ms·
> It sounds nice but it's just one non sequitur after another. A very sleek looking plane that is incapable of flight. I like this analogy, especially because
by leto_ii 6y ago
> It sounds nice but it's just one non sequitur after another. A very sleek looking plane that is incapable of flight.
I like this analogy, especially because it alludes to the Dijkstra quote [1]. In this light it's probably unfruitful to try to create submarines that mimic swimming or that look like fish - you'll just end up with fancy looking stones.
[1] "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim"
- rrrrrrrrrrrryan 6y agoYes - in English, the verbs "swim" and "think" both imply that the action is being performed by a lifeform. "Fly," for some reason, does not. I wonder if this holds up in other languages as well.