3 ms·

I tried it out with a picture of Brad Pitt. The results are NOT close, unless you think "Yes that's a white male" is close. The hair color was wrong, but that

I tried it out with a picture of Brad Pitt. The results are NOT close, unless you think "Yes that's a white male" is close. The hair color was wrong, but that could have been due to using a picture of Pitt where his hair is dyed blond but his black roots or showing, or just due to shadow. I guess they have many hundreds or thousands of images pre-generated, and when you upload a photo, they find the closest ones.

Icons8 6y ago
Hi, founder here. You're right about the pre-generated images! 2.6M to be precise, all of them are here: https://generated.photos/faces https://generated.photos/faces It definitely has some fitting issues; Brad Pitt is a good example as he dyes his hair. I've googled his hair situation so you don't have to. He most probably has gray hair, dyed dark, then highlighted. That's a challenge huh! As a result, you can feel some of these guys manipulated hair color: https://i.imgur.com/bC6AxXO.jpg https://i.imgur.com/bC6AxXO.jpg Anyway, I had better luck with Angelina Jolie. Hairwise, her hair looks also toned, but our dataset has way more colored women: https://i.imgur.com/WmTzRAZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/WmTzRAZ.jpg
- impostervt 6y ago
  Ya the bottom left is pretty good! I've actually bought from the site before so please don't think I was knocking it too hard. It's very useful when you need a unique image of a face.
  - Icons8 6y ago
    Thank you for buying and thank you for your encouragement! My personal fault was positioning. We can’t make everyone looking similar. As you said, we have a bunch of files on a disk, heavy indexed ones. We spend a year working on diversity, including running as photo studio, but it has limits yet. So, we needed to invent a use for it. Anonymizing seemed like the opposite of resemblance, yet people wait for the latter. More resemblance (and prettier the face) more they like it. I wonder if the current tech is marketable without false expectations.

Icons8 6y ago

Hi, founder here. You're right about the pre-generated images! 2.6M to be precise, all of them are here: https://generated.photos/faces https://generated.photos/faces It definitely has some fitting issues; Brad Pitt is a good example as he dyes his hair. I've googled his hair situation so you don't have to. He most probably has gray hair, dyed dark, then highlighted. That's a challenge huh! As a result, you can feel some of these guys manipulated hair color: https://i.imgur.com/bC6AxXO.jpg https://i.imgur.com/bC6AxXO.jpg Anyway, I had better luck with Angelina Jolie. Hairwise, her hair looks also toned, but our dataset has way more colored women: https://i.imgur.com/WmTzRAZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/WmTzRAZ.jpg

impostervt 6y ago
Ya the bottom left is pretty good! I've actually bought from the site before so please don't think I was knocking it too hard. It's very useful when you need a unique image of a face.
- Icons8 6y ago
  Thank you for buying and thank you for your encouragement! My personal fault was positioning. We can’t make everyone looking similar. As you said, we have a bunch of files on a disk, heavy indexed ones. We spend a year working on diversity, including running as photo studio, but it has limits yet. So, we needed to invent a use for it. Anonymizing seemed like the opposite of resemblance, yet people wait for the latter. More resemblance (and prettier the face) more they like it. I wonder if the current tech is marketable without false expectations.