4 ms·
> The total amount of radioactive waste on the earth is about the size of a swimming pool (or was that the total amount of gold? I forgot, either way in terms o
by piker 6y ago
> The total amount of radioactive waste on the earth is about the size of a swimming pool (or was that the total amount of gold? I forgot, either way in terms of quantity it's not that much)
This seems wrong in both places. There are probably enough gold rings manufactured per year to fill a swimming pool. In pictures: Fort Knox itself seems to have at least a swimming pool of gold [1] and Thailand a swimming pool of waste.[2]
[1] https://external-preview.redd.it/rgD0FO1pELgkuXZzWC2NQk0vJZUUjxMl6o9MBX7WwDM.jpg?auto=webp&s=80a721910b3891129eeec2cca8d1815f58f33abf https://external-preview.redd.it/rgD0FO1pELgkuXZzWC2NQk0vJZU...
[2] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/TINT_Radioactive_wastes%27_barrel.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/TINT_Rad...
- nitrogen 6y agoThose piles of bars are shallow, and those barrels are probably mostly non-spent-fuel by volume.
- fanf2 6y agoIn the 1930s they put about 13,000 tonnes of gold in Fort Knox. (It now has about 4,500 tonnes). Density of gold is about 20g/cm^3, or 20 tonnes per cubic metre. So Fort Knox held up to 650m^3 of gold. A normal swimming pool is about 25m x 12.5m x 2m which is 625m^3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Depository https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Deposito... This page indicates Sellafield has 2000m^3 of high level nuclear waste. https://ukinventory.nda.gov.uk/site/sellafield/ https://ukinventory.nda.gov.uk/site/sellafield/
- beervirus 6y ago> Reported volume: This is the volume actually taken up by wastes that exist at the Inventory stock date. It is the volume taken up by wastes inside the tanks, vaults, silos and drums in which they are contained.