3 ms·
It is probably pretty safe. The issues that occurred are now widely known about and pilot training will include dealing with an MCAS issue, so an exact repeat i
by alblue 6y ago
It is probably pretty safe. The issues that occurred are now widely known about and pilot training will include dealing with an MCAS issue, so an exact repeat is incredibly unlikely.
Although the FAA and EASA have certified the Max as safe to fly again, it will only be for airframes that have had the required modifications to prevent the runway trim and only once operation instead of continuous. They have also allowed the pilots to override by the stick which they weren’t able to do before.
Statistically it’s highly likely that there won’t be any further occurrences of this issue with the 737 Max again.
Depending on when you are doing it may be that the airline won’t have time to train the pilots in which case they won’t be flying it at the start of next year. However I expect that to change over the year and that most 737 Max flights are back in operation by the end of the year, or at least as many as are needed to fly in the reduced circumstances of today’s pandemic.
- chopin 6y ago> It is probably pretty safe. I wouldn't hold my breath. MCAS may have been fixed although I am even unsure about that. The regulatory capture problem hasn't been solved and I didn't hear that the FAA widened its capabilities. EASA will follow FAA as they don't want to risk Airbus certifications as a retaliation. What concerns me even more: MCAS has been unknown to pilots and maybe the FAA. What about other unknowns Boeing didn't reveal? I don't believe that they came forward voluntarily with unrelated concerns. I don't believe that the FAA did look thoroughly into other corners (they lack the capability anyways). I don't think that EASA did an independent vetting either. I am sure that Boeing did change the least they could get away with. And that proper independent oversight is lacking. The only safety net the public has is that maybe, maybe someone high up at Boeing wouldn't want the risk of more failures as this may destroy Boeing. But I don't hold my breath for that either. There is no honor among thieves and no personal incentive for executives. FAA should have been dropped as trustworthy authority worldwide. Only in that event I would have trusted a 737 Max. But there's too much money at stake on all sides.
- reducesuffering 6y agoWhile I share the concern, I'm hoping the FAA and Boeing realize that a single additional crash that involves US citizens would unleash a fury that would make the last one pale in comparison. I would be surprised if either of them would make it out without being completely gutted and rebuilt, with massive executive jail time. I hope for everyone they do realize the stakes of allowing anything similar to the MCAS failures to even be a faint possibility.
- florencebuzz 6y agoNot a chance. This is America we’re talking about. Executives of companies the size of Boeing don’t go to jail.
- chopin 6y agoOh, I am pretty sure they realize that. However the ones taking the decision will not bear the consequences. They didn't the last time. That's what I fear.
- blackrock 6y agoIt’s still a death trap. Did they even physically modify the plane, by adding additional redundant sensors? The problem is that the plane suffers from a design defect. Which Boeing tried to fix with software, by using a faulty sensor, that had no redundancy. Which then got certified as safe by the FAA, because they are corrupt and in collusion with Boeing. Fly the plane at your own risk. Make sure to buy a spare coffin on Black Friday specials.