6 ms·
I’m not sure how this could be cheaper than RDS...? Nor do I see how the complexity of this solution could be justified except in the most performance sensitive
by jtdev 6y ago
I’m not sure how this could be cheaper than RDS...? Nor do I see how the complexity of this solution could be justified except in the most performance sensitive situations.
- gregwebs 6y agoTiDB is for larger scale data and thus a better comparison would probably be with AWS Aurora. We do see customers saving money by taking on the complexity of operating a database themselves rather than using the AWS offering.