3 ms·
> The point of national parks isn’t to preserve wilderness for the sake of preservation. The point is recreation. The national parks service philosophy is very
by cowboysauce 6y ago
> The point of national parks isn’t to preserve wilderness for the sake of preservation. The point is recreation.
The national parks service philosophy is very preservationist. They advise people to follow guidelines that are literally called “leave no trace”. Their mission statement uses the word preserve in the first sentence. Hell, part of the reason why Big Bend national park never became an international park (among many others) was because the parks service disagreed with the laxer, conservationist approach that Mexican authorities favored.
>The point is recreation. This is why they are full of artificial modifications like roads, trails, and sometimes attractions with shops and bathrooms.
Those modifications are done carefully to have as little impact on the environment and a lot of types of recreation are completed banned in national parks, hunting being the obvious one. The use of vehicles (including bicycles) is completely banned in federally designated wilderness.
What steps did whoever installed this take to make sure that this thing isn’t going to leech metals into an ephemeral watering hole used by wildlife?
- s1artibartfast 6y agoI agree that the NapS is ver preservationist, compared to the blm, where the monolith is located. For what it is worth 66/75 of national parks permit hunting. https://www.doi.gov/blog/hunting-and-fishing-national-parks-and-fish-and-wildlife-refuges https://www.doi.gov/blog/hunting-and-fishing-national-parks-...