3 ms·
Completely agree. It would be much more interesting to compare the data in a bin fashion from 2019 -> 2020 like this 0.1 - 1 1-10 10-20 20-50 50+ And the
by mrlala 6y ago
Completely agree. It would be much more interesting to compare the data in a bin fashion from 2019 -> 2020 like this
0.1 - 1
1-10
10-20
20-50
50+
And then see how ridiculous quote just the average is in this case..
- redisman 6y agoI wish there was some attention paid to upload speeds too. A 100Mbps connection often only has 1-5Mbps upload which seriously handicaps it for work and hobbyists.
- lotsofpulp 6y agoHence I consider anything that’s not symmetric fiber to not be worthy of mentioning, because I know you’re getting on upload (and probably latency and packet loss too).
- nightcracker 6y agoIn other words, the interesting comparison is two log histograms (or overlaid).
- mrlala 6y agoSure although I would say you can't just throw it into log bins automatically.. some data you need to massage it to what makes the most sense.
- eru 6y agoIn general, no need for histograms, if you learn to love cumulative distribution functions (or CDF for short). See eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_functi...
- Nbox9 6y ago50+ is a rather large bin. Netflix recommends 25+ for streaming 4K, so we could assume 50+ is ~2 4K streams, which seems like a normal amount for a family. There’s a big difference between a house getting 50down and 5up and a house with a symmetric gigabit fiber connection.
- eru 6y agoThey sort of did compare it in a bin fashion, since they gave the median.