I'm aware, and I take issue with the "this is bad because I have an uncomfortable relationship with money" approach that the article took. The point of the aut

I'm aware, and I take issue with the "this is bad because I have an uncomfortable relationship with money" approach that the article took. The point of the author's digital sleuthing was not for inspiration, it was to find fault to reinforce a conclusion they had already made. I doubt there was any transparent and accurate reporting that would have satisfied their idea of acceptable. The primary difference with the 501(c)3 is that 5% of the assets has to be granted per year. It would for the most part have the exact same flexibility as this organization.